office@casecon.com

Search
Close this search box.

+44 (0) 20 7376 4418

Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Competition Litigation and Damages Economists

Specialists in providing expert economic evidence in antitrust, competition damages and collective actions

Practice Areas

Casenotes

‘Ethylene cartel did not cause damages’ – says Dutch court rejecting Shell’s €1bn claim

In July 2026, the District Court of Amsterdam rejected a €1bn damage claim by Shell Chemicals Europe (SCE) against members of the ethylene buyer cartel. The European Commission found that the four defendants had exchanged price-sensitive information aimed at depressing the prices they paid SCE for merchant ethylene. SCE’s follow-on action failed because it over-relied on econometric analysis, which the court rejected as statistically flawed and unsupported by a plausible theory of harm. This Casenote assesses the judgment and draws out the lessons for those pursuing follow-on antitrust claims.

Read More »

News

Ethylene cartel did not cause damages

The Amsterdam District Court rejected Shell’s (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:7690) and Repsol’s (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:7691) circa €1b follow-on damage claim against the four members of the ethylene buyers’ cartel (Press Release). The judgments found that the Claimants’ econometric and other evidence was implausible and unreliable, and that Shell’s ‘enormous’ loss was generated by its expert’s inappropriate comparison with prices in Asian markets. Cento Veljanovski together with Carina Lange, gave evidence in the defence of Vestolit/Orbia instructed by Mark Gidley and Mark Powell of White & Case, working with Rick Cornelisson’s team at Houthoff. Further details Here.

Copyright @ CASE Associates 1995-2026